(Solved): Use a truth table to determine whether the argument is valid or invalid. \[ \begin{array}{l} -p \ri ...

Use a truth table to determine whether the argument is valid or invalid. \[ \begin{array}{l} -p \rightarrow q \\ q \rightarrow p \\ \hline p \wedge \sim q \end{array} \] Choose the correct answer below. A. The argument is invalid because the truth table is not a tautology. The argument does not match any known valid argument forms. B. The argument is invalid by the fallacy of the inverse. C. The argument is valid because the truth table is a tautology. The argument does not match any known valid argument forms. D. The argument is valid because this argument matches the valid argument form of reasoning by transitivity. E. The argument is valid because this argument matches the valid argument form of modus ponens. F. The argument is invalid by the fallacy of the converse.