(Solved): Spotlight on Taco Bell-Implied Contract. Thomas Rinks and Joseph Shields developed Psycho Chihuahu ...

Spotlight on Taco Bell-Implied Contract. Thomas Rinks and Joseph Shields developed Psycho Chihuahua, a caricature of a Chihuahua dog with a "do-not-back-down" attitude. They promoted and marketed the character through their company, Wrench, LLC. Ed Alfaro and Rudy Pollak, representatives of Taco Bell Corp., learned of Psycho Chihuahua and met with Rinks and Shields to talk about using the character as a Taco Bell "icon." Wrench sent artwork, merchandise, and marketing ideas to Alfaro, who promoted the character within Taco Bell. Alfaro asked Wrench to propose terms for Taco Bell's use of Psycho Chihuahua. Taco Bell did not accept Wrench's terms, but Alfaro continued to promote the character within the company. Meanwhile, Taco Bell hired a new advertising agency, which proposed an advertising campaign involving a Chihuahua. When Alfaro learned of this proposal, he sent the Psycho Chihuahua materials to the agency. Taco Bell made a Chihuahua the focus of its marketing but paid nothing to Wrench. Wrench filed a suit against Taco Bell in a federal court claiming that it had an implied contract with Taco Bell and that Taco Bell breached that contract. Do these facts satisfy the requirements for an implied contract? Why or why not? [Wrench, LLC. v. Taco Question One: What does summary Judgment mean? (3 points) Question Two: If Taco Bell won Summary Judgment in its favor, what would happen to Wrench's (the cartoonists') case? (3 points) Question Three: (12 points) c) What were the elements of an implied in fact contract that the Taco Bell cartoonists (the plaintiffs) needed to prove to win their lawsuit? (These are in addition to offer and acceptance, consideration, and mutuality of intent, those are not the items I am asking for). List the elements in your answer that prove an implied in fact contract. d) List the facts specific to this case that meet those elements you listed in part a). Question Four: How does an implied-in-fact contract differ from an implied-at-law contract? As part of your answer, list the elements of an implied-in law contract? (offer and acceptance, consideration, and mutuality of intent are not the items I am asking for) ( 2 points) Question Five: How did the use of implied-in-fact contract theory help the cartoonists win their case against Taco Bell? (6 points)